This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
documentation:next_cdm:procedure_codes [2015/11/03 21:31] vojtechhuser |
documentation:next_cdm:procedure_codes [2015/11/04 18:27] (current) vojtechhuser |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=== Proposal === | === Proposal === | ||
- | ^Field^Required^Type^Description^ | + | This proposal does not involve a change to the CDM schema. |
+ | This is follow up on discussion at Bethesda F2F meeting. It was suggested to do an evaluation of granularity in various procedural terminologies. | ||
- | ---- | + | In the long run (not possible today): The idea is to make all CPT4 codes non standard concepts. (change in OHDSI Vocabulary) |
- | === Use Cases === | + | |
+ | === Background === | ||
A phenotype definition (patient cohort) may include Diagnostic or Medication Code. However, it can also include Procedural code. e.g., patients who had chest X ray done. | A phenotype definition (patient cohort) may include Diagnostic or Medication Code. However, it can also include Procedural code. e.g., patients who had chest X ray done. | ||
Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
Possible terminologies may be ICD10PCS or SNOMED (specifically, procedure codes within SNOMED). Snomed does not offer the needed granularity. | Possible terminologies may be ICD10PCS or SNOMED (specifically, procedure codes within SNOMED). Snomed does not offer the needed granularity. | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | === Use Cases === | ||
+ | Allow procedures to be part of phenotype definitions. |